By Med7at Bakri | June 9, 2015
American Democratic
President Obama goes on playing the role of a responsible world leader without
blinking, when he is in fact orchestrating the Devilish plan of his Republican predecessor
President George W. Bush, conceived by Bernard Lewis and propagated in the
1970’s and the 1980’s by Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski and other
Zionists in the American administration. They had determined that another 1973
surprise must not be repeated and, hence, the entire region had to be
reconfigured. This proves that regardless of the party or the Administration,
great powers do not change their strategic objectives.
Clearly, the Obama administration
is now engaged in fourth-generation wars against all the countries in the
region and is behind all the upheavals and the colored revolutions in the
entire Middle East region, just as former American administrations conducted
the colored revolutions in Eastern Europe and now in the Ukraine. Presidential
Study Directive 10 on “Preventing Mass Atrocities” available on the White
House website and still unveiled confidential Presidential Study Directive 11
on “Obama’s Secret Islamist Plan” go to prove the facts:
Directive 11: Obama’s Secret Islamist
Plan
Behind the rise of ISIS,
the Libyan Civil War, the unrest in Egypt, Yemen and across the region may be a
single classified document. That document is “Presidential Study
Directive 11.”
You can download
Presidential Study Directive 10 on “Preventing Mass Atrocities” from the White
House website, but as of yet no one has been able to properly pry number 11 out
of Obama Inc.
Presidential Study
Directive 10, in which Obama asked for non-military options for stopping
genocide, proved to be a miserable failure. The Atrocities Prevention Board’s
only use was as a fig leaf for a policy that had caused the atrocities. And the
cause of those atrocities is buried inside Directive 11.
With Obama’s typical use
of technicalities to avoid transparency, Directive 11 was used to guide policy
in the Middle East without being officially submitted. It is possible that it
will never be submitted. And yet the Directive 11 group was described as “just finishing its work” when the Arab Spring began. That
is certainly one way of looking at it.
Directive 11 brought
together activists and operatives at multiple agencies to come up with a
“tailored” approach for regime change in each country. The goal was to “manage”
the political transitions. It tossed aside American national security interests
by insisting that Islamist regimes would be equally committed to fighting
terrorism and cooperating with Israel. Its greatest gymnastic feat may have
been arguing that the best way to achieve political stability in the region was
through regime change.
What little we know about the resulting classified 18-page report is that it used euphemisms
to call for aiding Islamist takeovers in parts of the Middle East. Four
countries were targeted. Of those four, we only know for certain that Egypt and
Yemen were on the list. But we do know for certain the outcome.
Egypt fell to the Muslim
Brotherhood, which collaborated with Al Qaeda, Hamas and Iran, before being
undone by a counterrevolution. Yemen is currently controlled by Iran’s Houthi
terrorists and Al Qaeda.
According to a New
York Times story, Obama’s Directive 11 agenda appeared to resemble Che or
Castro as he “pressed his advisers to study popular uprisings in Latin America,
Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia to determine which ones worked and which did
not.”
The story also noted that
he “is drawn to Indonesia, where he spent several years as a child, which
ousted its longtime leader, Suharto, in 1998.”
The coup against Mubarak
with its coordination of liberals, Islamists and the military did strongly
resemble what happened in Indonesia. The most ominous similarity may be that
the Muslim mobs in Indonesia targeted the Chinese, many of whom are Christians,
while the Muslim mobs in Egypt targeted Coptic Christians.
Both were talented groups
that were disproportionately successful because they lacked the traditional
Islamic hostility to education, integrity and achievement. Islamist demagogues
had succeeded in associating them with the regime and promoted attacks on them
as part of the anti-regime protests.
Chinese stores were
looted and thousands of Chinese women were raped by rampaging Muslims. Just as
in Egypt, the protesters and their media allies spread the claim that these
atrocities committed by Muslim protesters were the work of the regime’s secret
police. That remains the official story today.
Suharto’s fall paved the
way for the rise of the Prosperous Justice Party, which was founded a few
months after his resignation and has become one of the largest parties in the
Indonesian parliament. PJP was set up by the Muslim Brotherhood’s local arm in
Indonesia.
His successor,
Bacharuddin Jusuf Habibie, was more explicitly Islamist than Suharto and his
Association of Muslim Intellectuals (ICMI) conducted a campaign against
Christians, Hindus and Buddhists. It helped purge non-Muslims from government
while Islamizing the government and Indonesia’s key institutions.
Habibie had been the
Chairman of ICMI and ICMI’s Islamists played a key role in moving Suharto out
and moving him in. It was obvious why Obama would have considered the
Islamization of Indonesia and the purge of Christians under the guise of
democratic political change to be a fine example for Egypt.
While we don’t know the
full contents of Directive 11 and unless a new administration decides to open
the vaults of the old regime, we may never know. But we do know a good deal
about the results.
In its own way, PSD-10
tells us something about PSD-11. Obama’s insistence that human rights be made a core national
security interest paved the way for political and military interventions on
behalf of Islamists. Obama had never been interested in human rights; his
record of pandering to the world’s worst genocide plotters and perpetrators
from Iran to Turkey to Sudan made that clear. When he said “human rights”,
Obama really meant “Islamist power”.
That was why Obama refused
to intervene when the Muslim Brotherhood conducted real genocide in Sudan, but
did interfere in Libya on behalf of the Brotherhood using a phony claim of
genocide.
Positioning Samantha
Power in the Office of Multilateral Affairs and Human Rights at the National
Security Council was part of the process that made over the NSC from national
security to servicing a progressive wish list of Islamist terrorist groups that
were to be transformed into national governments.
Power, along with Gayle
Smith and Dennis Ross, led the Directive 11 project.
Secret proceedings were
used to spawn regime change infrastructure. Some of these tools had official
names, such as “The Office of The Special Coordinator For Middle East
Transitions” which currently reports directly to former ambassador Anne
Patterson who told Coptic Christians not to protest against Morsi. After being
driven out of the country by angry mobs over her support for the Muslim
Brotherhood tyranny, she was promoted to Assistant Secretary of State for Near
Eastern Affairs.
“The Office” is still
focused on “outreach to emergent political, economic and social forces in
Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya” even though counterrevolutions have pushed out
Islamists in Egypt and Tunisia, while Libya is in the middle of a bloody civil
war in which an alliance of the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda controls the
nation’s capital.
The men and women
responsible for Directive 11 were making it clear that they had learned
nothing.
Directive 11 ended up
giving us the Islamic State through its Arab Spring. PSD-11’s twisted claim
that regional stability could only be achieved through Islamist regime change
tore apart the region and turned it into a playground for terrorists. ISIS is
simply the biggest and toughest of the terror groups that were able to thrive
in the environment of violent civil wars created by Obama’s Directive 11.
During the Arab Spring
protests, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit had told Hillary Clinton
that his government could not hand over power to the Muslim Brotherhood. “My
daughter gets to go out at night. And, God damn it, I’m not going to turn this
country over to people who will turn back the clock on her rights.”
But that was exactly what
Hillary Clinton and Obama were after. And they got it. Countless women were
raped in Egypt. Beyond Egypt, Hillary and Obama’s policy saw Yazidi women
actually sold into slavery.
Directive 11 codified the
left’s dirty alliance with the Muslim Brotherhood into our foreign policy. Its
support for Islamist takeovers paved the way for riots and civil wars
culminating in the violence that birthed ISIS and covered the region in blood. And
it remains secret to this day.
